On 3/28/07, Denny Colt wikidenny@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/28/07, Oldak Quill oldakquill@gmail.com wrote:
This discussion isn't about allowing certain banned users to continue editing, it is about not reverting particular kinds of edits regardless of whether the user is banned or not (the argument being that to revert the edits doesn't benefit Wikipedia and expends energy unnecessarily).
-- Oldak Quill (oldakquill@gmail.com)
Actually thats exactly it. People edit warred with me to ensure brandt's words stayed up. I don't understand why he gets a free pass, as Erica said. Either all banned users should, or none. If they want to contribute... use a different name. If we KNOW it's them, rv them as policy says. If that isn't right, change the policy.
- Denny
Arbcom have in the past ruled that acting as a proxy for a blocked user is a serious offence.