On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>wrote;wrote:
No problem, we might as well take a stab at it. However, my experience
here is of deadlock, not resolution. Deadlock characterized by sterile
repetition of fixed positions.
Great. One of us should ask the techies to get it set up.
[To Alex] Entire revolutions can occur the wiki without coming to a user's
attention. A mailing list devoted to dispute
resolution would focus
attention, even if all it did was point to significant on wiki
discussions. The functionaries list and, presumably the arbitration list
already do this. A dispute resolution list would clue everyone in, not
just functionaries and arbitrators.
Indeed. Ostensibly, the list would deal with not just specific dispute
resolutions, but with dispute resolution itself - how it works, etc. These
concepts haven't changed much since late 2003, and as such there may need to
be adjustments - people have ideas I'm sure. And of course, dealing with
both specific cases and with general concepts in the same context makes it a
bit of an integration issue. And that's another answer for Alex's question -
integration based on a particular concept. If the concept was Electric
Trains, then of course a separate mailing list wouldn't be justified.
-Stevertigo