On 27/05/2009, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
That too is an example of being overly literal and
avoiding common sense.
Please explain how removing publicly available, legal, verifiable,
information from the wikipedia is common sense again?
I think this is madness. And further, I don't have to follow it
anyway. You're espousing censorship, but it's a *core value* that the
wikipedia is *not* censored. But it's only a *guideline* that we don't
include typical dosages. ergo: we don't have to follow it.
--
-Ian Woollard
"All the world's a stage... but you'll grow out of it eventually."