On 27/05/2009, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
That too is an example of being overly literal and avoiding common sense.
Please explain how removing publicly available, legal, verifiable, information from the wikipedia is common sense again?
I think this is madness. And further, I don't have to follow it anyway. You're espousing censorship, but it's a *core value* that the wikipedia is *not* censored. But it's only a *guideline* that we don't include typical dosages. ergo: we don't have to follow it.