On 3/27/07, Phil Sandifer
<Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Oh pshaw.
Even ignoring the fact that en's inclusion policies on articles like
this are a load of crap, it passes the most stringent proposed ones.
It has multiple non-trivial mentions in reputable sources (SFWA and
Making Light), the sources are all reputable (her website is a valid
primary source for information on her). There's a reason it
overwhelmingly survived an AfD last year.
But is it NPOV?
That's the key concern with biographies of living persons. A BLP can
be impeccably sourced, but if it only presents one side of the
story...
In my experience doing OTRS work from time to time, a large proportion
of problematic BLPs are (fairly) well sourced, but they are
nevertheless not NPOV.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com