Will, simple question: do you accept that trivial disambiguations can
be unencyclopedic and give the wrong impression, and if so, is having
a neutral dab hatlink better than a jarring note being sounded at the
top of a page, the first thing the reader will read after the title?
OK, that was a long simple question...
Carcharoth
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:47 PM, <WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
This is how I do it. If in "Plankton" we
have only one other thing named
planton, then we shouldn't have a disamg page just for two items. That seems
overkill. So in that case SB_Plankton makes sense. If however in "Bob
Jones" we have 15 people, 3 things, and 2 places named "Bob Jones" then
it
makes sense to have a disamg page.
I.E. there's a trade-off in having too many clicks, where it is? two
items? or three?
W.J
In a message dated 8/19/2009 7:37:26 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com writes:
If there really is a chance that
people will search for "plankton" in an attempt to find out about the
SB character, then the hatnote should be neutral and direct people to
a disambiguation page ("for other things named plankton, see here").
And I don't care if that disambiguation page only has two entries.
That is an acceptable trade-off to having a spongebob squarepants
character name jarring people's reading experience by being placed at
the top of an unrelated article.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l