Larry Sanger wrote:
All,
Earlier today, I had no joy in trying to post this "open letter to Jimmy
Wales" on Jimmy's own user talk page: the man himself deleted it. That is
not the sort of behavior I would have expected of the head of an allegedly
open, transparent community devoted to free speech.
<snip>
I came up with and promoted the idea
of making a wiki encyclopedia, wrote the first policy pages and many more
policy pages in the following year, led the project, and enforced many rules
that are now taken for granted. I came up with a lot of stuff that is
regarded as standard operating procedure. For instance, I argued that talk
should go on talk pages and got people into that habit. Similarly, after
meta-discussion started taking up so much of Wikipedia's time and energy, I
shepherded talk about the project to
meta.wikipedia.org - and after that, to
Wikipedia-L and WikiEN-L. I insisted that we were working on an
encyclopedia, not on the many other things one can use a wiki for.
Putting aside
for the moment, the rest of your missive of quite
respectable length; if you do deserve kudos for creating the
very first heuristics for channeling discussion to appropriate
fora, it is sadly regrettable that you were not able to choose
the initial forum where you published your diatribe with more
discernment.
User talk pages in current practice are not for blogging or
personal communication (except to the extent that such
personal communication is in the aid of cementing the trust
and fellow feeling contributors have with each other, and
thus helps our work as a community). User talk should be
squarely about improving the encyclopaedia.
You may not have taken the trouble to acquaint yourself
with the methods by which legitimate feedback and comment
on wikimedian matters is currently channeled, but it would
very much be worth your while, to facilitate a smoother
communicative experience.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen