2009/7/20 Carcharoth <carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com>om>:
It would be interesting to compare why low-resolution
is considered OK
here, to support and encourage the revenue stream of a professional
photographer, but not in the case of the National Portrait Gallery
(where the underlying works are public domain), and the revenue stream
is (in theory) supporting the digitisation costs.
Because the photographers copyright claim is legit. Under US law the
National Portrait Gallery's isn't.
--
geni