Once someone does sort through it, and proposes
something, the actual
voting is comparatively unproblematic. There have been occasions when
voting has been too slow, but that can be dealt with by e.g. leaving
nagging messages on peoples' talk pages. The biggest and hardest to
overcome delays are those where voting has simply never started, because
nobody had the time or inclination to wade through the pile of evidence
and accusations to distill a set of options to vote on in the first
place. How to solve that I don't really know.
It shouldn't be awfully hard. At the moment, we have less than half
the arbitrators prepared to do this - Fred, James, Mav, Jw and Raul. I
don't think I've missed anyone. The simple answer is that we need
another seven who are equally prepared to put in the time and get this
done.
-- ambi