On Nov 29, 2007 4:14 PM, jayjg
<jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
Your summary of the discussion regarding this seems reasonable, but
unfortunately doesn't jibe with the facts. For days now several
individuals have been insisting that the cyberstalking list was used
to discuss and co-ordinate a block of !!, along with various other
wild accusations (e.g. "stealth canvassing", whatever that means).
Rot.
After the denials that the block was discussed on-list, the
discussion has moved on. Move with it, don't keep on making the point
you can make.
By the way, the denials were issued early on the 27th. Here are Alec's
statements from late on the 28th: