--- Daniel Ehrenberg name12323@hotmail.com wrote:
Sounds good, but only a sysop could change that status of the page. Or maybe there could be a cookie identifier on each person's computer so we could track them? The cookie would be blockable.
Hello list,
For Tannnin I don't like very much the idea of adding another class level on Wikipedia. I think it is a slow constitution of a very rigid hierarchy, where more and more people forget being a sysop imply more duties than rights. And it would make very obvious that non-loggued in people are not trusted.
For Daniel What do you mean by a trackable cookie ? Another spying intention on people ? Invasion privacy ? Tracking exactly what ?
Yours
Athypique
Maybe it is worth considering having a special
class of Wikipedia
article that is not a completely protected page,
but can only be edited
by logged-in contributors. I'm not sure if this
would work or not, or
if it would be practical to implement. I'm just
thinking aloud. Any
bright ideas out there? Comments?
Tony Wilson (Tannin) list@redhill.net.au
___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com