On Dec 6, 2007 6:06 PM, <joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu> wrote:
Quoting Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org>rg>:
On Dec 6, 2007 5:49 PM, jayjg
<jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
What CC list?
The list of people who communicated via CC: and BCC:, which was the
precursor to the cyberstalking list.
I can tell you that that list had very little to do with the later
cyberstalking
list. For example, I was on the CC for that list and was very strongly not
invited to the reformed list (apparently I argued with the general consensus
too much, and one comment was interpreted by some editors as trolling). While
those two lists had a lot of overlap, I don't see how it would help you.
Furthermore, there were at least two editors on the cc list who used email
addresses they generally keep private. So no, I don't think you'll be getting
any list, nor for that matter do I see why you should. Many of the people on
the cc never asked to be on the list nor made any comments, and I wouldn't be
surprised if the later formed list was very similar.
Why is this list important you anyways? At the risk of throwing more
fuel on the
fire, this sounds very close to some sort of attempt at guilt-by-association.
I think you misunderstood me, because I never asked for the list of
email addresses subscribed to any of the lists. As for why the list
is important, I don't know whether it is important or not. It's
potentially important, but on the other hand it might not be
important. Depends on the details which have not yet been made
public.