-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
James D. Forrester wrote:
Michael Snow wrote:
>"Fair use" is laziness too in many
cases. But my point was that if
>you're going to the trouble of asking for permission, which is otherwise
>commendable, it is lazy and counterproductive not to take the very
>simple step of asking for permission *under a free license*.
Well, it's rare to get permission for GFDL licensing or whatever; I've
managed to get loads of replies which are happy to give Wikipedia a
licence, but will not be able to license under GFDL/CC-BY/etc. - dozens
and dozens of them. Some of them, I noted, ended up just being grabbed
and copied for fair use instead (by other users), which is more than
just a little dispiriting.
Unfortunately, the biggest hurdle seems to be the commercial use aspect.
I tried to obtain permission for a (what turned out to be unfree)
Featured Picture. The image we had was a lower-resolution version of a
very large, high-quality composite photo. Permission was refused solely
on the basis that their photo could be used *by anyone who wanted to*
for commercial purposes. People seem to be absolutely paranoid about
copyright.
IANAL, and is seems that the people we commonly ask permission from are
in the same position.
- --
Alphax
OpenPGP key: 0xF874C613 -
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, 'Thy will be done,'
and those to whom God says, 'All right, then, have it your way.' - C. S.
Lewis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCz+3+/RxM5Ph0xhMRA7iuAJ4wxB/vrcOkr6ucZ1P/FVP/DN2NsACgjp5h
8NG+cNYEE9J09W/9Ity0RbM=
=hhR2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----