>Stuff like that, you cut it, say "see
talk" in the edit summary and
say "source please" ;-)
Yeah, for sure. I removed it immediately, but Lavergne's complaint came after it had
been excised from the live article for at least a day. Which means he must either take
issue with the fact that the prior edit, which was removed, is either in the edit history
of the article, or still present on the talk page. (I removed the information from the
talk page, but it remains in the history.)
K.