Korekt mi yf A'em rang -
Does'nt it seem like group discussions in general follow a nice pattern - of
starting out with problems/assumptions/assumed problems/problematic
assumptions - and then they finally boil down to their real essence after a
couple of deiz?
The essence usually falls into the categories of - unfeasible/feasible -
resonable/uneasonable - POV/NPOV - constitutional/unconstitutional (meaning
the WP constitution ). Just sorting these basic things out, I think is hard
sometimes - and its good to have a sorta way of explaining these fundamental
problems in discussions that get in the way before any discussion takes
place.
-S