Jimmy Wales wrote:
The section consists of what appears to be meticulously
referenced one-sided statements about a dispute that this fellow was in,
giving the impression of importance and leading the reader to a
conclusion that is not contained elsewhere.
We don't want to overemphasize the other side, but if Langan refuses to
defenf his position in the courts, and gets a default judgement he needs
to accept the consequences of his own actions.
Additionally, the section in question is quite
controversial, with 4
editors having objected to it, as well as the subject of the biography,
who wrote a rather long rebuttal on the talk page.
He wrote a long raint, not an effective rebuttal. He is as much
responsible for making this a controversy as anyoone else.
Ec