On 07/08/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It doesn't even mention the critical bit, that all
relevant views are
supposed to be there. According to that summary, [[GWB]] could simply
contain GWB bashing with no rebuttal, as "fairly" representing the
views of Democrats...
I like the fact that when you combine NPOV and third-party
verifiability, you get that critical views are relevant only insofar
as they too can be documented. e.g. [[Michael Moore]] needs a critical
section; an article on a minorly notable scientist probably won't.
- d.