On 07/08/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't even mention the critical bit, that all relevant views are supposed to be there. According to that summary, [[GWB]] could simply contain GWB bashing with no rebuttal, as "fairly" representing the views of Democrats...
I like the fact that when you combine NPOV and third-party verifiability, you get that critical views are relevant only insofar as they too can be documented. e.g. [[Michael Moore]] needs a critical section; an article on a minorly notable scientist probably won't.
- d.