Christopher Mahan wrote:
I feel that an encyclopedia of our caliber can really
positively
impact the lives and education of younger people. By which I mean
anyone who can read and click a mouse (I don't know how old that is,
but my guess is around 4 years old)
I doubt that 4-year-olds can profitably read our text.
Still, we shouldn't bar them from reading, so your point is OK.
I would want to be able to send a 10 year old
inquisitive mind to the
W without any reservation.
I would send a 10-year-old to [[en:Peyronie disease]] without reservation.
Besides, if someone wants to see adult nudity, I can
give them a few
"juicy" links ;)
Just to demonstrate I'm not prude or anything.
What good would that do the 10-year-old interested in Peyronie disease?
You may not be a prude, but you still equate nudity with pornography,
so you may as well be one. I want to see pictures of Peyronie disease,
not bowlderised drawings (detailed drawings that aid understanding are OK),
nor irrelevant "juicy" porn just to demonstrate that you're not a prude.
-- Toby