Like all this bogus text can just go to:: * the article's talk page, or * a user talk page, or * the MetaWikipedia
I'm totally into meta, cuz peeps won't be like fighting and stuff over POVs! And when surfs up, the parts we all dig can boogie on over to the real Wikipedia!!
Surfer Dude -----Original Message----- From: Stevertigo [mailto:stevertigo@attbi.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:56 AM To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Turks and Kurds
Danny complined: Now we have an article called "Turkish atrocities against Kurds" which consists of a random selection of cut and pasted articles from other sources. It exceeds 35 K and the heading says "Notes for an article." Wikipedia is not a place to stick random notes, newspaper articles or whatnot. I believe this can be an article. It can even be an NPOV article (though it isn't now, because apart from political rhetoric, the article barely documents the atrocities it claims to describe). Can we at least formulate a policy on this type of behavior.
Steve: Nonsense! In fact we should have *note pages* in addition to talk pages! Great idea Danny, Im glad you came up with it. Reason? Im not in the mood to add material and have it mercillessly chopped up by a bunch of bored piranhas... Im cooking my meal before I serve it. F
irst the ingredients! Be well, Dan. _~~~