Like all this bogus text can just go to::
* the article's talk page, or
* a user talk page, or
* the MetaWikipedia

I'm totally into meta, cuz peeps won't be like fighting
and stuff over POVs! And when surfs up, the parts we
 all dig can boogie on over to the real Wikipedia!!

Surfer Dude
-----Original Message-----
From: Stevertigo [mailto:stevertigo@attbi.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:56 AM
To: wikien-l@wikipedia.org
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Turks and Kurds

Danny complined: Now we have an article called "Turkish
atrocities against Kurds" which consists of a random selection
 of cut and pasted articles from other sources. It exceeds
35 K and the heading says "Notes for an article." Wikipedia
is not a place to stick random notes, newspaper articles
or whatnot. I believe this can be an article. It can even be
an NPOV article (though it isn't now, because apart from
political rhetoric, the article barely documents the atrocities
it claims to describe). Can we at least formulate a policy
on this type of behavior.

Steve: Nonsense! In fact we should have *note pages* in
addition to talk pages! Great idea Danny, Im glad you came
 up with it. Reason? Im not in the mood to add material and
have it mercillessly chopped up by a bunch of bored piranhas...
Im cooking my meal before I serve it. F

irst the ingredients! Be well, Dan. _~~~