On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Carcharoth
Some interesting comments have been posted to that blog.
And of course some off-topic ranting. The original WSJ article shows how
easy it is to put together a newspaper article of people's gripes. Which
is not that surprising after eight and a half years of Wikipedia. But no
way does it do a good job of identifying what is going on, in terms that
stand up to analysis. And I mean something intermediate between sweeping
generalisations and anecdotal evidence.
Anyone else feel that Mr. Murdoch's little list beginning "1. Trash
Google rather than actually noindex News Corp's pages" has Wikipedia as
alternate new source somewhere on it?