On 5/2/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/05/07, Anthony <wikilegal(a)inbox.org>
wrote:
And it's also perfectly easy to write an
informative and useful
article about the topic which does quote the string in question. So
unless the foundation takes a position that we can't mention the
string, I think we should.
Definitely. But I think we should wait a month, when the massive
distributed spam attack has calmed the fuck down.
Wouldn't including the information in the encyclopedia obviate the
need for the spam attack in the first place? It's not a rhetorical
question, as I'm unfamiliar with all the details of the spam attack.
Anthony