On 5/2/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
And it's also perfectly easy to write an informative and useful article about the topic which does quote the string in question. So unless the foundation takes a position that we can't mention the string, I think we should.
Definitely. But I think we should wait a month, when the massive distributed spam attack has calmed the fuck down.
Wouldn't including the information in the encyclopedia obviate the need for the spam attack in the first place? It's not a rhetorical question, as I'm unfamiliar with all the details of the spam attack.
Anthony