Cheney Shill wrote:
Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
Apropos rules, which are applied consistently. Please compare http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:66.108.42.9 andhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArch...
I see a block for censorship and another for vandalism, the other is a 3RR violation for reverting it, which isn't enforced because the changes being
reverted are rule violations.
This is consistent with what I've seen before, which is a nice
change. Because the page is
in fact about the comics, the comics (or a link to it if the
copyrights were enforced) really
does belong on the page.
WP:BP does not mention "censorship" as a case for a block. No admin would block anyone for removing the Goatse.cx image from the Goatse.cx article or any porn from any porn stars article. What rules do the reverted changes violate, so the other 3RR violations are not enforced?
My position on censorship is that if we permit this comic to be removed, anything critical or that parodies any religion becomes subject to removal if it offends
some of the believers.
I don't want the cartoons to be removed. I want them to be moved behind a link. I'd wish, that Wikipedia distances itself from the incitement of religious hatred against any religion by either linkimaging such examples or by putting such examples on articles like anti-Semitism or Islamophobia.