Cheney Shill wrote:
Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
Apropos rules, which are applied consistently. Please compare
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pa…
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArc…
I see a block for censorship and another for vandalism, the other is a 3RR violation
for reverting it, which isn't enforced because the changes being
reverted are
rule violations.
This is consistent with what I've seen before,
which is a nice
change. Because the page is
in fact about the comics, the comics (or a link to it
if the
copyrights were enforced) really
does belong on the page.
WP:BP does not mention "censorship" as a case for a block. No admin
would block anyone for removing the Goatse.cx image from the Goatse.cx
article or any porn from any porn stars article.
What rules do the reverted changes violate, so the other 3RR violations
are not enforced?
My position on censorship is that if we permit this
comic to be removed, anything critical or
that parodies any religion becomes subject to removal if it offends
some of the
believers.
I don't want the cartoons to be removed. I want them to be moved behind
a link. I'd wish, that Wikipedia distances itself from the incitement of
religious hatred against any religion by either linkimaging such
examples or by putting such examples on articles like anti-Semitism or
Islamophobia.
--
Raphael