Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
I believe you are misreading what is said here. It is
not being stated
that Arbcom has no time to do the job. Rather, it is being stated that
if it wants to do the job, it doesn't also have the time to deal with
all the heckling and rewriting of history that can go on after a case is
closed.
I appreciate the correction. My point simply was that there is a place
for "heckling," even after the close of the case. The issue then is
how to focus that signal - irritating as worn-out-brakes it may be -
into something coherent.
The distinction here is that its a fatal error to characterize what
people say as just wiki-lawyering, when the issue is solveable through
broader signal enhancing techniques, that if Arbcom wants to, we can
start exploring.
-Stevertigo