On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:01:36 -0400 (EDT), "Jeff
Raymond"
<jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
That is, if there was *really* an immediate
spammer problem to be had. I
recall Brad Patrick's breathless essay about how inundated we're getting
with spam, and then the G11 abomination occurred, but the actual necessity
of such a reaction was never really introduced - we seem to be extremely
trusting of those in the home office, don't we?
We were inundated with spam. We still are. G11 is a necessary tool,
and in any case we could creatively delete blatant spam as vandalism
anyway. The vast majority of G11 tagged articles *are* abominations,
unlike G11. Spend time looking at CAT:CSD some time.
Personally I like I95. With BBD/JLD doing 72 in a 98 328i. LMAO.
Anthony