Well, I would say "preach on brother," but youve got to give us some specifics. Which Arbcom members - what issues. Dont generalize.
Personally, I dislike the fact that Jimbo made those arbitrary appointments of relatively conservative members. But he justified them at the time that the Arbcom was shrinking, a "thankless job" and needed some membership -- who am I to argue with the founder's wisdom? I could say that in a wiki world, he could have called for a special election and had newly elected temporary members in a week. But again, who am I to argue?
SV
Jack Lynch jack.i.lynch@gmail.com wrote: I am before the current ArbCom, and while I felt comfortable w every other ArbCom we have had, Jimbo's recent appointees make me feel unsafe, and dubious of justice, despite the overwhelming evidence against my accuser. Something must be done, the status quo cannot continue. No justice, no peace.
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 11/17/05, geni wrote:
On 11/17/05, uninvited@nerstrand.net wrote:
We have a comparatively new user to thank for [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2005/Straw poll]].
I think the presence of this poll as well as the level of support it has garnered are both troubling.
Wikipedians appear to be viewing the AC as some sort of generalized means of governance, which it isn't.
uc
Arbcom rulings have been cited in policy debates. Arbcom is the single most powerful group on wikipedia. For obvius reasons people want a say in who is in it.
-- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--------------------------------- Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.