I haven't followed this discussion in full, so sorry if I'm wrong here. I
believe that statement was made by Kurt, whilst it was David who started off
this discussion here.
That said, I agree that in *some* of those cases, deletion isn't warranted.
In any case, I don't think we should blame the list in whole for what one
member has done.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Martijn Hoekstra <
martijnhoekstra(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/03/2008, Martijn Hoekstra
<martijnhoekstra(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I was referring to this:
> "If you want to try and concentrate efforts to end the deletion
> madness, you might
> want to focus on those five that I list there so we don't spread
ourselves
out."
That does seem a bit pointy, and possibly
disruptive in my opinion
Oddly enough, I have been pushing for general participation in AFD,
and consider focusing on a few articles not likely to be useful.
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Which I believe is fine by the way. It is just that a coordinated
effort to change the outcome of a handful AfD's is disruping the
process of AfD, and even worse, it seems to be exactly the goal of
Kurts initiative, not a byproduct of it.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l