I haven't followed this discussion in full, so sorry if I'm wrong here. I believe that statement was made by Kurt, whilst it was David who started off this discussion here.
That said, I agree that in *some* of those cases, deletion isn't warranted. In any case, I don't think we should blame the list in whole for what one member has done.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Martijn Hoekstra < martijnhoekstra@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/03/2008, Martijn Hoekstra martijnhoekstra@gmail.com wrote:
I was referring to this:
"If you want to try and concentrate efforts to end the deletion madness, you might want to focus on those five that I list there so we don't spread
ourselves
out."
That does seem a bit pointy, and possibly disruptive in my opinion
Oddly enough, I have been pushing for general participation in AFD, and consider focusing on a few articles not likely to be useful.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Which I believe is fine by the way. It is just that a coordinated effort to change the outcome of a handful AfD's is disruping the process of AfD, and even worse, it seems to be exactly the goal of Kurts initiative, not a byproduct of it.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l