On 4/20/07, Christiano Moreschi <moreschiwikiman(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
Brandt's right on one thing. Unblocking him was a complete waste of time.
We
either delete his bio or we don't. His state of blockedness is entirely
irrelevant to that decision. This whole business has been handled with
neither clarity nor unity of purpose, and has merely generated a whole
load
of mostly irrelevant discussion. We should block him, delete the bio, and
move on. Eventually the fuss from those who don't like the deletion will
die
off.
The problem with reverting/protecting back to one version Brandt liked a
while ago is that we don't know he'll like it now, and he hasn't told us
what he doesn't like about the current version. Gah, what a depressing
mess.
Kill the article, please!
Moreschi
So if someone causes enough of a depressing mess on a certain article you'd
give in and delete it?
Now that's depressing. Don't let vandals hear it, or they'll start causing
problems in more articles than you could imagine.