On 2/9/06, Michael Snow <wikipedia(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
Matt Brown wrote:
You don't have a userpage in order to exercise
any "right" to free
speech, but because it helps the project; it aids communication and
makes people happy. You never did have the right to say anything you
pleased there; disruptiveness has always been unacceptable.
It seems to me that many of our recent social problems could be reduced
by changing the culture that actively discourages editing other people's
user pages. Remember, they are on a wiki, and subject to the same GFDL
and "merciless editing" as anything else. Instead of having the uproars
incited by deletions and blocking, just edit away. You don't have to be
an administrator to help out, either.
And yes, I think it follows from this that there are circumstances under
which someone could appropriately be blocked for violating the
three-revert rule in their own user space. I would defer to individual
preferences on almost all matters, but disruptive use of user pages
should be treated like disruptive editing anywhere else.
--Michael Snow
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
It makes people happy for a reason. It gives them their own little corner on
the site which is "theirs". If anyone was able to edit my userspace, it
would no doubt kill the formatting I like so much, and who is to say the
links I need to work effectively will remain?
If editing of userpages wasn't discouraged, who says we wouldn't get more
disputes (which are now confined to other pages). If there's things clearly
unacceptable for userpages like rants, attacks, and certain disruptive
things, we should simply state those outright and take action against those
who break those rules.
Mgm