--- Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Kelly Martin wrote:
A few Arbitration Assistants would not be remiss,
either.
Kelly
I really like this idea. It seems to work pretty
well in the U.S.
courts: The higher court would simply refuse to hear
the appealed case
unless they think something went /procedurally/
wrong in the lower
court. This would give us near-infinite scalability
while still
maintaining accountability for the higher "judges"
if you will. There
aren't really any drawbacks either. I would be in
favor of creating a
proposed policy to this end.
I guess I misunderstood Kelly's statement. A
tiered-court idea is exactly whats called for - as
opposed to just beefing up the size.
SV
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com