Stevertigo wrote:
Cuncators Sysop status is directly at odds with his
heavy handed
behaviour regarding this page - contradiction Jim's notions that
sysops stay neutral.
Are you accusing him of using sysop powers "in a fight" or merely of
using ordinary wiki editing in a way that you don't like?
Sysops are held to a high level of accountability for using sysop
powers, as they are supposed to be only "technical". But we are *all*
held to a high level of accountability for ordinary editing, and there
is no leeway for non-sysops on this.
Dont expect the answer to come from the top...
Jim stays neutral because hes hoping people can find resolutions on their
own... You comprende, Victoria? -SV
I generally find that if I keep my mouth shut for awhile, NPOV
emerges. In this cases, we went over all this with the "Aids" slogan,
and I thought the result was fine. I said my piece there.
Some slogans, even hateful slogans, are of sufficient historical (or
other) importance that they can deserve a separate article. The Aids
Kills Fags Dead slogan is a great example. When I first heard about
the page, I thought, "Oh gosh, that doesn't sound like a valid article
at all." But then I read the article and realized that it was a
legitimate topic.
--Jimbo