Stevertigo wrote:
Cuncators Sysop status is directly at odds with his heavy handed behaviour regarding this page - contradiction Jim's notions that sysops stay neutral.
Are you accusing him of using sysop powers "in a fight" or merely of using ordinary wiki editing in a way that you don't like?
Sysops are held to a high level of accountability for using sysop powers, as they are supposed to be only "technical". But we are *all* held to a high level of accountability for ordinary editing, and there is no leeway for non-sysops on this.
Dont expect the answer to come from the top... Jim stays neutral because hes hoping people can find resolutions on their own... You comprende, Victoria? -SV
I generally find that if I keep my mouth shut for awhile, NPOV emerges. In this cases, we went over all this with the "Aids" slogan, and I thought the result was fine. I said my piece there.
Some slogans, even hateful slogans, are of sufficient historical (or other) importance that they can deserve a separate article. The Aids Kills Fags Dead slogan is a great example. When I first heard about the page, I thought, "Oh gosh, that doesn't sound like a valid article at all." But then I read the article and realized that it was a legitimate topic.
--Jimbo