And even if "do no harm" really _was_ a
universal principle that we all
followed, it's still open to debate whether reporting information like
this actually does cause harm.
Such matters are a question of judgment. Information about potential harm
needs to be accurate and common sense applied. To a certain extent this
conversation has been about, "Common sense, what's common sense?, I don't
want no stinking commons sense, I'll work to rule and, if harm results,
tough!, Harm to Wikipedia?, Public relations? Piss on that!"
Fred