I could have done that. Do that myself at times, as when I fixed some
pretty serious errors in the featured article of Sept 24.
Kim
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
There's also a fact checker wiki project. You can
have them have a go at
referencing the thing...
On 10/2/06, Kim van der Linde <kim(a)kimvdlinde.com> wrote:
> That would amount to deleting around 90% of the article as
> unsourced........
>
> Kim
>
> MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
>> Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce?
>> Have them remove any uncited crap.
>> If ALA 2000 is a specific list with set entries, remove anything that
>> shouldn't be there.
>> Be bold!
>>
>>
>> On 10/2/06, Kim van der Linde <kim(a)kimvdlinde.com> wrote:
>>> The [[List of banned books]] is a mess, and the way people have added
>>> challenged books to the list (ALA_2000 entries) and the clogging up
> with
>>> many doubtful entries (just listed without explanations etc) has made
> it
>>> the target of creationists who try to get a book listed that a book
> that
>>> they claim is banned, but which in fact is far from that (if their
>>> rational holds, the bible is banned book).
>>>
>>> Could some people deal with this list?
>>>
>>> Kim
>>> --
--
http://www.kimvdlinde.com