I could have done that. Do that myself at times, as when I fixed some pretty serious errors in the featured article of Sept 24.
Kim
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
There's also a fact checker wiki project. You can have them have a go at referencing the thing...
On 10/2/06, Kim van der Linde kim@kimvdlinde.com wrote:
That would amount to deleting around 90% of the article as unsourced........
Kim
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
Wikipedia:Cleanup Taskforce? Have them remove any uncited crap. If ALA 2000 is a specific list with set entries, remove anything that shouldn't be there. Be bold!
On 10/2/06, Kim van der Linde kim@kimvdlinde.com wrote:
The [[List of banned books]] is a mess, and the way people have added challenged books to the list (ALA_2000 entries) and the clogging up
with
many doubtful entries (just listed without explanations etc) has made
it
the target of creationists who try to get a book listed that a book
that
they claim is banned, but which in fact is far from that (if their rational holds, the bible is banned book).
Could some people deal with this list?
Kim