On 1/30/06, Chris Jenkinson <chris(a)starglade.org> wrote:
I don't agree with the first premise. Why is it
better to delete "crap"
articles than improve/rewrite them?
That's sort of like saying, why do we have to choose between tax cuts
and more spending on health? Why don't we cut taxes *and* spend more
on health?
Oh wait..
Anyway, the vastness of crap on Wikipedia and the high proportion of
stubs indicate that the wikipedia workforce is unable/unwilling to
keep up with this amount of work. So, given that our poor dog is
suffering a terminal illness in great pain, do we put him down or
simply pray for him to get better?
Steve