On 1/26/07, Jeff Raymond <jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
On 26/01/07, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I was thinking of something different over the
weekend. A Wikipedia
Article Subjects Noticeboard, where people or organizations could post
things which they object to (short of what the Office would *have* to
deal with) and editors can watch and respond to normally.
That's the sort of idea I was thinking of.
Would enough regular editors actually respond? That's the only thing
I'm wondering about.
I don't dislike it, but I do fear established editors with
anti-pay-for-edits axes to grind trying to deny things left and right.
Then there's the whole inclusionist/deletionist thing, and I see some
messes.
We can fight those battles if they come up, but I think that what this
does is give a process to make the issues completely transparently
visible, where everyone can see what's going on and comment if they
care.
Better that, and find out what's going on, than having it happen in the shadows.
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com