2009/9/9 David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>om>:
BLP talks
about removing unverifiable harmful information about living
people, it doesn't say verifiable harmful information should be
removed (unless it is given undue weight).
That's the point - it's entirely in order to be very conservative in
what's accepted as verification of such.
If you genuinely think the sources are unreliable, then fine, but I
don't believe that is the case. You are wikilawyering, pure and
simple. If you want to ignore the rules, that's fine, we explicitly
allow that, but be honest about it.