--- Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/19/06, Ilya N. <ilyanep(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm...the only problem is that I see arguments
over 'No, this goes into
Wikipedia:. No this goes in Community:. No no
nonono! " ad nauseum
That's a fair point. And at the end of the day, why
should there exist
a "community"? WP:NOT explicitly discourages it...
I think JW's response to Angela was fairly
conciliatory on the basic nature of community is
itself based in expression. The issue then became one
about separation from content namespaces.
Im simply adding the little factor that the Category:
namespace shouldnt be used for community purposes
either. We already have a Wikipedia namespace which
can be used to encapsulate any community wiki pages.
So, assuming its just as easy to add a separate
Community: namespace, the issue is then what
functionality should it have? Templates can be
transcluded from subpages just fine. It then makes
sense to make a separate category table for the
community.
Steven
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com