On 20/02/07, Parker Peters parkerpeters1002@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/20/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
I'd generally allow it to pass myself in the first instance, FWIW. Though I'd expect substantiation to follow. It's supposed to be a productive working list for a project.
The user in question has, in fact, mailed in not just numerous diffs but a very accurate description of the situation. In fact, they were attacked by other users of this list for sending "too many" emails, apparently because the list system was not functioning properly and did not inform them of the moderation queue.
I was speaking in general, as the original question asked me seemed to be about the general approach.
- d.