On 20/02/07, Parker Peters <parkerpeters1002(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/20/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'd generally allow it to pass myself in the
first instance, FWIW.
> Though I'd expect substantiation to follow. It's supposed to be a
> productive working list for a project.
The user in question has, in fact, mailed in not just
numerous diffs but a
very accurate description of the situation. In fact, they were attacked by
other users of this list for sending "too many" emails, apparently because
the list system was not functioning properly and did not inform them of the
moderation queue.
I was speaking in general, as the original question asked me seemed to
be about the general approach.
- d.