This regards Undue weight part of NPOV:
There still seems to be a great deal of ambiguity, even among admins, as to what qualifies
as a majority. So here's a simple example to evaluate as a starting point.
*View Moo has 3 sources that support it.
*View Bark has 15 sources that support it.
Which has the majority? Should either be be dropped completely? Should either be reduced
to a footnote or an "other views" section deeper within the article? Again, for
simplicity, all the sources are equally reliable, reputable, and prominent.
Other than all or most of the sources of either being non-notable or biased, are there any
circumstances in which you would reverse the majority/minority or consider Moo and Bark
Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo!
Messenger with Voice.