Right, but Doc created it to make a point about instruction creep. The
fact
that now it's actually happening really says something about our lack of
preparation.
- GC
On Jan 11, 2008 10:31 AM, Majorly <axel9891(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 11/01/2008, WikipediaEditor Durin
<wikidurin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Don't say I didn't warn you. Already we've got bureaucratic nightmares
erupting.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_rollb…
>
> "Given the volume of people being granted rollback, I think we need
a
formal
"Requests for rollback review" to deal with issues like the
above,
so that we can discuss and build consensus on whether someone's
rollback tool should be removed. As I said, we also need a proper,
3-day discussion process before granting rollback in the first
place."
This is so funny it's painful.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Yeah, Doc glasgow created a page like that already.
--
Alex (Majorly)
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Majorly
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
His WP:POINT creation is nothing like what is happening though (some recent
developments, however, have made me question RfR's suitability).
--
Alex (Majorly)