Its absence is not a violation provided we write biographies with tact
as blp advises us to do.
On 12/29/08, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:14 AM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2008/12/29 David Goodman
<dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com>om>:
If we permit opt out, we will have a situation
where we have, for all
medium-level people who are somewhat less than famous, favorable bios
only. There is no possible way to have both NPOV content and
subjects owning the articles on themselves. Whatever way we solve the
difficulties with BLP, it shouldn't be turning us into an publicity
platform.
Correct. Opt-out will violate NPOV.
- d.
I think opt-out more than flagged, more than semi, more than anything
else would be fought to the death over by some extremists. But I don't
know if it would violate NPOV. Is an absence a violation?
- Joe
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l