On 5/7/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think they are missing anything, they just have different
values. Wikipedia works on the principle that a small amount of
incorrect information is an acceptable price to pay for a large amount
of correct information. When the incorrect information is negative
stuff about a particular person, that person tends to disagree - it's
understandable, really.
Yes, that's another good point. We're putting together something
really great, but not all of the chaff gets separated. And it is
understandable because it's mostly not the way that any other
informative work has been compiled.
--
[[en:User:Merovingian]]