On 5/7/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think they are missing anything, they just have different values. Wikipedia works on the principle that a small amount of incorrect information is an acceptable price to pay for a large amount of correct information. When the incorrect information is negative stuff about a particular person, that person tends to disagree - it's understandable, really.
Yes, that's another good point. We're putting together something really great, but not all of the chaff gets separated. And it is understandable because it's mostly not the way that any other informative work has been compiled.